W11.1_WAS_MARR based on full equity fund for Takoyaki


1. Problem Statement

For the follow up of CfH comment about my Week 11th Blog posting, in this posting I will discuss about the value of Minimum Attractive Rate of Return (MARR) as our basis to determine will a project be profitable or not?

There is a minimarket which has a big parking lot near to my house. Many food truck services park their “truck” there, from Kebab, meatball, noodles, to snow ice. Residential usually buy a snack in those food trucks when shopping at the minimarket. I wonder to make my own food truck, and I need to make sure that this business is feasible to proceed.

Image

Continue reading

1 Comment

Filed under Week 11, Wirawan ASP

W11_WAS_Takoyaki


Problem Statement

There is a minimarket which has a big parking lot near to my house. Many food truck services park their “truck” there, from Kebab, meatball, noodles, to snow ice. Residential usually buy a snack in those food trucks when shopping at the minimarket. I wonder if I make my own food truck, will it be profitable or not?

Image

Continue reading

1 Comment

Filed under Week 11, Wirawan ASP

W14.1_SSG_Re-estimate project Cost using PERT method


PROBLEM DEFINITION

Currently we are in the start beginning of Execution phase of Topside EPCI project. The baseline duration has been setup. Prior to Kick of Meeting, management is asking project team to estimate the duration of the project in worst case, normal situation, best case and find the estimate cost that is “technically justified”.

Continue reading

1 Comment

Filed under Sutoyo S, Week 14

W5.2_SSG_Re-estimate project duration using PERT method


PROBLEM DEFINITION

Currently we are in the start beginning of Execution phase of Topside EPCI project. The baseline duration has been setup. Prior to Kick of Meeting, management is asking project team to estimate the duration of the project in worst case, normal situation, best case and find the duration that “technically justified”.

Continue reading

1 Comment

Filed under Hadianto P, Week 05

W14_SSG_Re-estimate project Cost using PERT method


PROBLEM DEFINITION

Currently we are in the start beginning of Execution phase of Topside EPCI project. The baseline duration has been setup. Prior to Kick of Meeting, management is asking project team to estimate the duration of the project in worst case, normal situation, best case and find the estimate cost that is “technically justified”.

Continue reading

1 Comment

Filed under Sutoyo S, Week 14

W5.1_SSG_Re-estimate project duration using PERT method


PROBLEM DEFINITION

Currently we are in the start beginning of Execution phase of Topside EPCI project. The baseline duration has been setup. Prior to Kick of Meeting, management is asking project team to estimate the duration of the project in worst case, normal situation, best case and find the duration that “technically justified”.

Continue reading

1 Comment

Filed under Sutoyo S, Week 05

W18_APE_Berth Occupancy Rate Exercise Using Crystal Ball Software


  1. Problem Definition

BOR or Berth Occupancy Rate is one of key element to be used for any port investment assessment. Using BOR information, the Designer then able for designing the wharf size required for vessels berthing. Indeed, the composition of each port BOR depend on logistic planning for cargo and for our port the most important cargo will be sulphur pallets deliver in containers. For W18 blog i will exercise sulphur BOR using crystal ball software.

Continue reading

1 Comment

Filed under Arif P, Week 18

W17_APE_My Re-Baseline Schedule


  1. Problem Definition

Last week it is been recognized that we already in 50% class program. For W12 it is time for re-baseline schedule due to some changes in our class project. I had personnel communication with DR Paul and from his emails I had the knowledge that there are two methods of doing re-baseline and some conditions for re-baseline. DR Paul suggests me to try these two methods on hands so I can have my understanding for this concept. I used my personnel schedule for exercise re-baseline in W17 blog posting.

  Continue reading

7 Comments

Filed under Arif P, Week 17

W11_AEP_Rebaselining the well work operation using Earned Value


Problem identification

Although earned value (EV) offering a new paradigm on well servicing operation monitoring to measure its performance, the operation itself still contain uncertainties. Well servicing is not a fixed project as the project done on the surface. When we’re working subsurface beneath the ground, so many uncertainties haunts the operation.

A workover operation was performed to shut off the watered formation and recomplete to produce the oil from the same formation. Recompletion means to change all existing completion string and replace with the new one. Unfortunately, we found difficulties when millng and fishing the packer which extends the duration and of course the cost. Decision was made to continue the operation. Looking at the progress and the performance, revision to the program is a necessity.

The EV approach is challenged to help us create and monitor the revised budget and duration.

Continue reading

5 Comments

Filed under Afriandi EP, Week 11

W7.1_HPO_Determining The Contractor’s IRR in Production Sharing Contract


1. Problem Statement

Production Sharing Contracct (PSC) is a kind of contract between government and investor to share the production of petroleum after deduction of extraction cost. Government and contractor share the risk and result of production. How the contractror should calculate the real IRR of their investment recovery through PSC?

Continue reading

2 Comments

Filed under Hadianto P, Week 07