W19_APE_Asphalt Pavement Core Drill Test

  1. Problem Definition

The common method today for pavement thickness assessment after execution [both asphalt and concrete] compare to contract specification is using core drill method. Consultant Supervision and Client determine method assessment in the bid for payment work item with tolerance according to standard. Field core drill test can be used also to assess pavement quality since we have samples from test points. Both parameters are the guideline for declaring work progress for Contractor.

Figure 1

Figure 1 Field Core Drill Test

  1. Identify the Feasible Alternative

There are three possible progress payment conditions adapted from core drill test result: 1. 100% applied contract unit rate, 2. Reduction contract unit rate and 3. Reject working progress.

  1. Development of the Outcome for Alternative

Core drill points taken along the length of asphalt road pavement with mean value and standard deviation calculation[1] as present below:

Figure 2a

Figure 2b

Figure 2 Core Drill Data, Mean and Standard Deviation

Next thing to do is establishing control limits X-chart[2], [3] & [4] as present below:

 Figure 3

Figure 3 Core Drill Test-X Chart

  1. Selection Criteria

Contract specification requirement for surface thickness is 36 mm. If there is thickness reduction then applied 80% reduction unit price until max 5 mm reduction. If more than 5 mm reduction then Client has the right not to pay or to reject Contractor work progress based on overall quality assessment. Client will not pay any excess of surface thickness [if any] to Contractor.

  1. Analysis and Comparison of the Alternative

From data table present in Figure 2, present in Figure 4 unit price payment application as follow:

 Figure 4

Figure 4 Unit Price Payment Application

As shown in Figure 4 there are seven excess thicknesses that become Contractor risk. Also there are four points of 80% payment reduction and one point less than requirement that required overall quality assessment.

For overall quality three steps produce for assessment as follows:

  • Refer to mean data Contractor provides good quality pavement surface thickness [36.71 mm > 36 mm]

  • Checking for any internal cause for out of control situation refer to some criteria[2]:
    • One or more points fall outside the control limits [outside +/- three sigma]
    • Two points, out of three consecutive points, are on the same side of the average between +/- two and three sigma or beyond
    • Four points, out of five consecutive points, are on the same side of the average between +/- one and two sigma or beyond
    • Nine consecutive points are on the same side of average
    • There are six consecutive points, increasing or decreasing
    • There are 14 consecutive points that alternate up and down
    • There are 15 consecutive points between mean and +/- one sigma and mean

The result on Figure 3 shows no internal process causes for out of control situation that proves the deliverable compliance according to specification.

  • Last step is checking process capability factors according to reference[1]Figure 5

Figure 5 Cp and Cpk Factors for Process Variability Assessment

Both Cp and Cpk factors indicate that process variability from actual executions meets specification [Cpk factor use to check if there is difference between specification with mean or actual data spread instead only using Cp factor].

  1. Selection of the Preferred Alternative

Based on assessment as described previously Client can accept 100% Contractor working progress but with 80% points unit price reduction for five points locations.

  1. Performance Monitoring and the Post Evaluation of Result

Core drill test can be used as well for checking asphalt content using testing Marshall from the sample of asphalt pavement, but for concrete pavement usually Client perform testing Compressive for assess concrete strength. The best common practice for quality assessment of pavement structure is combining this test with thickness test for progress payment approval.


[1]Reid, R. Dan, Sanders, Nada. R. (2011), Operations Management, An Integrated Approach 4th Edition. Hoboken, United States: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

[2]Brassard, Michael., Ritter, Diane. (2010), The Memory Jogger 2nd Edition (pp.53-70). New Hampshire, United States: GOAL/QPC.

[3]Pearsonschoolsandfcolleges.co.uk. (2013). Statistical Process Control Chapter 04. Retrieved from: http://www.pearsonschoolsandfecolleges.co.uk/FEAndVocational/Mathematics/ALevel/AdvancingMathsForAQA1stEdition/Resources/Statistics8/05chap04.pdf.

[4]Erikusnadi.wordpress.com. (2013). Statistical Process Control. Retrieved from: http://eriskusnadi.wordpress.com/download/.


1 Comment

Filed under Arif P, Week 19

One response to “W19_APE_Asphalt Pavement Core Drill Test

  1. AWESOME, Pak Arif!!! Very well done case study and you did a great job on the analysis…….

    This too would make a great paper for you to publish in the future!!!

    Keep up the good work!!! Almost done with your blog postings so you can focus on preparing for your exam!!

    Dr. PDG, Jakarta

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s